Shure makes fantastic in-ear headphones. Is the Andromeda worth all the hype and extra cash? And can it compete with the much more established Sure brand? Both, the Andromeda and SE use around-the-ear cables, so they take a few seconds securely fit in your ears.
Based on the fit, the SE definitely has better sound isolation than the Andromeda. They both look damn cool. The Andromeda has five balanced armature drivers, while the SE has four. Both headphones use a three way configuration system for dedicated low, mid and high frequency distribution.
Campfire Andromeda Versus Shure SE846 Comparison Review
Campfire went with dual high frequency drivers that use a 3-D printed chamber; it foregoes compression to open and extend high frequencies. And Sure employed a snazzy low-pass filter that, apparently, produces the low-end performance of a subwoofer.
The Shure SE is characterized by its solid bass, while the Campfire Andromeda is praised for its clarity and extended highs. But the Andromeda is more articulate; you can hear the texture of the bass more clearly.
The lows on the SE are just really warm and juicy. On the Andromeda, the higher mids are a bit more emphasized than the lower mids. With the SE, the emphasis is in the lower mids.
The mids on both headphones are tastefully balanced. But in this range, it becomes apparent that the Andromeda has a much clearer, delineated sound. It is also a lot fuller, and vocals have more presence. The Andromeda is so amazing that, in comparison, the Sure almost sounds like its coming out of a tin can. For sure, rock and folk are a better listening experience on the Andromeda. The Andromeda wins again. Both headphones have a nice high extension, but in comparison to the Andromeda, the SE feels thin.
The Andromeda has more definition, separation and depth. Classical music sounds more moving on the Andromeda than on the SE simply because it feels more powerful.The SE comes in a rather substantial box. You slide out the outer cover to reveal a matt black box with an embossed Shure logo on the top and on the side it says SE in bold black letters, in a slightly different texture than that of the box.
Opening it up, reveals some literature under the lid and the rest of the contents contained in a transparent plastic case very similar to the tactical cases made by Pelican. Inside the Case you will find the IEMs set in a rubber casing, a Shure hard case next to it and a branded microfiber cloth on top. The Earpieces themselves are shaped like Kidney Beansakin to the SE and other Shure IEMs, with the shell being transparent, revealing the inner workings of the earphones, which I really like.
I like this particular style of earphones as they sit secure and ensure a good fit. The cables are attached using MMCX connectors and loop from over the ear and then down, in order to ensure stability.
I really like the variety of tips that Shure provides, you have the options of silicone tips, memory foam tips and regular foam tips to make sure you get the best fit and seal.
The Andromeda comes in a dark blue box with an illustration of the stars and a label with a groovy pattern of different shades of green. You open the box to find a hard Leather case that fills up the box. Under the case you will find the User Manual and beneath that you will find the included tips, of which you get a good variety, including Silicone, Memory Foam and Spinfit tips, a Lapel Pin and a cleaning tool as well.
What's the Difference Between Shure's SE535 & SE846 Earphones?
The leather case feels rather nice, it is indeed genuine leather. Inside the case is where you find the earphones themselves, nestled comfortably in the wool-like inner lining of the leather case.
The shells are machined from blocks of aluminium, blasted with zirconium and then green anodizationgiving them their unique look with the fantastic finish. Despite the unconventional shape, the Andromeda is still comfortable to wear, however the super wide nozzle can be a problem for some.
The variety of tips included helps in getting a good fit and seal. The finish of the earpieces and materials used, scream of quality. In my experience, Campfire has some of the best built earphones available in the world. The Shure SE has a really neat feature where the nozzles have Sound Filterswhich have their own sonic characteristics. Along with the Balanced filters, pre installed, you also have Sharp and Warm filters.
You get a tool with which you unscrew the filters and interchange them. This feature allows you to customize the sound of the earphones to your personal preference. However, in order to keep this post brief, I will base most of what I write on impressions from the Balanced Filter, though I will include some brief impressions with the other filters at the end.
So in addition to the Crossover a circuit that decides what frequency goes to which driver they also use an added Low Pass Filter, which allows the Driver dedicated to the Bass frequencies, really shine. The other three drivers act in harmony to produce the midrange and treble frequencies. So does this design actually work? The bass on these IEMs is excellent and it isn't just the mid-bass thump that a lot of IEMs do well, but it's also the overall body of the sub bass and the mid bass that really makes it an amazing experience.
The Low End on these IEMs is easily one of the best and one would have a hard time finding anything else that beats these. The Mids, though not as pronounced as the Low End, are sweet and energetic. The male vocals have that gravitas which you expect when seeing a Master Tenor live at the Opera. Also I must mention how airy the mids are, which makes the instruments sound so much more natural, as with other IEMs, the mids often sound a bit too intimate making instruments sound unnatural.I couldn't be more excited to do this review of the Shure SE Those of you who have followed the development of the site for the past few years will know that I have a major love of Shure earphones.
The company's E2C model was my first real step to a love of better in ear headphones. Still to this day I use the Shure SE and previously the as my go to earphones for the gym. Where I wasn't completely enamoured with the Shure headphone brand though was with the higher end 5xx series.
By the time I got deep enough into this murky headphone world it had seemed, that at the top end, the competition offered more, they had caught up, and ultimately I went for Phonak's incredible PFE and Earsonics SM2. I liked the 5xx series, there was little to complain about but it just didn't quite hit the spot for me personally, the didn't stand out.
Nowadays, given my lifestyle, work and so on I do most of my listening through custom monitors such as my Minerva Mi. Artist or UM Miracles but I was recently given a shot of the Shure SE for an extended loan and holy expletive this is one of the most incredible sounding in ear headphones you can buy.
Updated 22 March : This article was originally published in October and has been updated. Long term impressions of the Shure SE are also available beneath the conclusion.
Update November Well another year has passed since writing the Shure SE review and a lot of people have been asking if they are still relevant today given the numerous companies competing for your attention at this price point.
The simple answer is yes they are still one of the best in ear headphones on the market today and that is testament to how far ahead of the competition the were when released.
I still use them weekly and I have access to some of the best headphones in the world, I think that says a lot. I have to change out the cable out twice A simple and inexpensive task after getting it stuck in a car door as well as general wear and tear on another but other than that and buying new tips every now and again they have been completely hassle free and a joy to use. All of the included items are of incredible quality, these aren't just thrown in as an after thought, they are practical and will extend the life of your headphones.
So whats in the box? That is pretty much everything you will ever need with a new set of headphones and I love the fact that Shure have gone ahead and thrown it all in the package instead of making you pay for it through the nose for it at a latter date.
Campfire Andromeda vs JH Audio 13V2 Pro Review
Since this review was originally written I have had a lot of earphones to compare too and really only Dunu even come remotely close to Shure in terms of offering such a complete package. The technology inside the Shure SE stems from Shure having a one of the biggest research and development budgets on the market. Unlike companies like Beats who throw their money at marketing budget, Shure actually develops their headphones and tends to let their products speak for themselves.
Its little wonder that the company is one of the most used for microphones and monitors from actual performing and studio artists who demand the best from their audio gear. That said what Shure have done with the SE is taken everything the know and thrown the kitchen sink at making the best in ear monitor they possibly can.
Here is a very brief break down on how they attempted to achieve such lofty feats. Well in a word, Bass.But it sounds nothing like either earphone.
The SE is thicker across all frequencies. Highs mids and highs fade more quickly. Not that Andromeda is an emotional earphone. It is also meaningfully more spacious. The K10 is notably warmer and pushes a larger, more shouldery bass around.
Perhaps for this listener too much. Andromeda is more even-handed, less emotionally engaging when suddenly you switch to EMD or trance. But it is more emotionally engaging than either Jupiter or my guilty pleasure, the IQ.Plunge Audio Custom IEM's vs Shure SE846 Review
Jupiter is drier than either. It is more matter of fact, and, in comparison to the K10, pairs more amenably to genres organic or not. Andromeda retains similar bass sound pressure and detail to Jupiter, but with slightly more low-frequency space and Z-axis detail.
Both reach extreme highs and lows with ease. Midrange space extends furthest along the z-axis. That space pushes out to just beyond the shoulders and both up and down by a head. You have to search for it. Andromeda the earphone surrounds you. Its mids surround you, buttressed gently by smoothly transitioning bass and clear highs.
It is unchalky. Bass sound pressure takes a back stage position to low-frequency spatial cues. The weakness of this immersive do-all is specific to being so immersive, being such an adroit do-all.
It sounds good — great even — with all music. But sometimes, that spacious midrange draws more attention to itself than necessary. Music that tips in favour of a u-shaped sound ends up thick in the mids when feeding Andromeda, where typically mids are there to accent the contrasty edges of lows and highs. Personally, Andromeda and studio trance get on well- for about two albums. After that, I refill my wine, and pull off my socks.My colleagues have written extensively about both, the Solaris and the SE here and here.
The Solaris is bucks more expensive than the famous SE What makes the Solaris so much pricier than the SE, and is it worth investing the extra cash to get it? The Shure SE wins hands-down in this department. The only problem I have with the Solaris is the fit. After extended periods of use, the shells start to grate on the outside of my ear canals. That being said, not all people have the same complaint. And my ears are a little dainty.
Ugh, sorry. Extremely reliable in terms of snugness and comfort, the SE will also give you more sound isolation. The SE houses 4 balanced armature drivers, while the Solaris employs a hybrid setup, with 3 balanced armatures for the higher frequencies, and one dynamic for the lower frequencies. So, in theory, we can expect a bigger lows from the Solaris.
No mic and remote included. That being said, the cable use for Solaris is a beast. As mentioned above, size does matter. And some people prefer it small. The Solaris shells are yuge in comparison to the more reasonable and well-contoured SE But if you like to bling out, the Solaris is hard to beat.
That being said, the SE feels lighter and less cumbersome, while the shell seems solid enough to sustain a lot of wear a tear. If you feel like lightening the bass on the SE, you can use the different stems, included in the box, to change up the sound signature.
Playing some double bass tracks, both IEMs offered an impressively natural sound with a similar amount of resolve. But listening to cellos, the Solaris displayed a cleaner, more textured feel. Certainly, in terms of transparency, the Solaris is the sure winner.
Similar balance and presence here. Pretty even mids with vocals sitting slightly forward. But listening to rock songs with heavy instrumentation, the Solaris also did a better job in cleanly layering the instruments so that nothing felt left out. Listening to acoustic guitars strums, both IEMs had great separation. But the Solaris showed more outline, giving guitar picks extra definition. And the Solaris displayed more color in tone, giving it a more dynamic feel.
The Solaris is so rich, in fact, that it almost makes the SE sound tinny in comparison. The Solaris presented slightly more transparent highs, giving more substance to strings in this range.
I also listened to some Miles Davis. And again gain, the Solaris displayed more nuance while also being easier on the ears in the very highest registers.Super Best Audio Friends. Read these "rules" AND introduce yourself before your first post. A healthy approach to understanding measurements Being true to what the artists intended.
Multiple votes are allowed. I think I got most but lmk if I am missing any or want one added. JudeusNov 1, Ah, I shouldn't vote on those since the only one on that list that I personally ever listened to is the K It was 2 or 3 years ago, auditioned it on a store, listening to a couple of songs from T. Swift, Adele, and Bon Jovi with it yeah sorry nothing exquisite. A nice sounding IEM for me especially the vocals which are quite clear sounding, but also a seriously surprising one when the staff shows me the price tag Those tiny things shouldn't cost that much compared to the bigger transducers in headphones, right?
It looks mature, professional, will compliment your look when wearing a more formal attire, etc.
So much bass there are no mids. Last edited: Nov 1, I do think the Lyra is worse than the Z5 and is terribly overpriced as well.
BlueElephantNov 1, I haven't heard the Layla, but isn't it supposed to be more balanced than the normal JH signature? Surprised to see it with so many votes. Roxanne was my vote. OJnegNov 1, I only vote for what I've heard. It's hard to explain why I hated every single Westone I've listened to, W40 aside.
W60 appeared to me to have an overly thick, gooey, and slow presentation with a big fat uncontrolled bass. Voted for Dita truth because of its strange unnatural timbre. K10 also gets my vote. Too euphoric, lacked planktons. GriffonNov 1, So how do you decide? Both the Campfire Andromeda earphones and the Campfire Vega earphones have similarities in their designs. They are both graced with the super high-quality Litz cable. The biggest design difference between the Andromeda and Vega are their drivers.
The Campfire Vega has one non-crystalline diamond-carbon driver. It is 8. By contrast, the Campfire Andromeda has five balanced armature drivers: two for the low frequencies, one for the mid frequencies, and two more for the high frequencies. Additionally, the driver housing includes a small chamber called the TAEC tuned acoustic expansion chamber which delivers an extended frequency response in the low lows and high highs.
As a result of these differences between the two, the Campfire Vega has a smaller driver housing than the Campfire Andromeda.
Campfire Audio Solaris vs Campfire Audio Andromeda Review
This may affect how they both fit, although their shapes are both kind to different sized ears. I usually struggle with the fit of various in-ears, but these were both pretty painless. While both earphones have similarities in their sound signatures, the most noticable difference between the two lies in their midranges.
The Campfire Vega has a more scooped mid range, despite a boost at 4. As a result, the body of many vocals, but especially male vocals, is quieter in the mix than the the Campfire Andromeda.
However, for brighter vocals, particularly in pop music, the vocals sound present and crispy. By contrast, the Andromeda has a thicker midrange which feels more intimate with many vocal performances to my ear. It is also better for genres that rely on midrange clarity and thickness like orchestra, punk, and metal music. Additionally, it reacts more musically to acoustic instruments like piano, horns, and acoustic guitars.
Both earphones have a boost around 10kHz and as a result, can sometimes feel sibilant with female vocals or jazzy saxophones and cymbals. The high frequencies are interesting to compare. However, the Vega feels more spacious in the low-highs because of its midrange scoop. This quality makes it a lot of fun to listen to heavier rock music, metal, and punk. It is better for a wider array of genres that I personally listen to and has a thicker mid range. Both earphones, however, are extremely detailed but also wonderfully musical.
The Campfire Andromeda and the Campfire Vega are available for the best price here:. Campfire Andromeda at Audio Campfire Andromeda 2nd Edition at Audio Campfire Vega at Audio Find out how you can become a sponsor here.
Sign in. Log into your account. Forgot your password? Password recovery. Recover your password. Get help. Major HiFi.